In response to the release of AEMO's Gas Statement of Opportunities forecast today, Rai Miralles, Environment Victoria's Climate and Energy analyst, said: After many years of inaction, this latest forecast from AEMO is another wake-up call to the Victorian government that they need to get Victorian households off gas and support the rapid shift to […]
The post Victorian government must avert the worst impacts of energy shortfalls by rapidly electrifying homes first appeared on Environment Victoria.
The post Victorian government must avert the worst impacts of energy shortfalls by rapidly electrifying homes appeared first on Environment Victoria.
In response to the release of AEMO's Gas Statement of Opportunities forecast today, Rai Miralles, Environment Victoria's Climate and Energy analyst, said:
After many years of inaction, this latest forecast from AEMO is another wake-up call to the Victorian government that they need to get Victorian households off gas and support the rapid shift to energy efficient electric homes.
The good news is that the projected gas shortfalls are slated to hit in 2027 – so we still have time to address them – but the Victorian government needs to take action now.
The Victorian government needs to act now to avert the worst impacts of energy shortfalls by rapidly electrifying homes in an equitable manner (including subsidising lower income households and banning prohibitive gas disconnection fees).
It makes zero sense to keep making the problem worse by connecting more households to the gas network in Victoria – when we know they will be disconnected over the next decade because of energy security and climate change imperatives.
The message is clear from these gas shortfall forecasts – electrification of Victorian households isn't happening fast enough and needs to be turbo-charged as the state breaks its current gas addiction.
Delaying plans to help households switch away from gas means risking dangerous and polluting gas supply projects later that could blow Victoria's ambitious climate targets.
The next version of the Victorian government's Gas Substitution Roadmap must have strong goals and timelines for electrification and ensure that Victorians can access affordable and renewable alternatives to fossil gas.
Port Kembla LNG has for years tried to secure customers for their gas but have failed to do so due to their high prices.江南极速存款免向消费者提供昂贵污染气体,我们应给他们切换高效电热水的机会。 spost
AGL Energy has sought approval to expand coal ash dumps at Loy Yang A until 2043, well beyond power station's 2035 closure date.
The Japanese government's clean energy fund has also announced plans to use unviable carbon capture and storage techniques to trap emissions produced during hydrogen production and store them underground.
Environmental Justice Australia lawyer Ally McAlpine said:
"The nation's biggest single carbon polluting power plant shouldn't be allowed to dump coal ash next to communities for another two decades. Shockingly, the new coal dumps will be six times the size of the MCG.
If AGL is serious about closing Loy Yang A within 12 years, it shouldn't need a permit to dump coal ash for almost 20 years.江南极速存款Something doesn't add up.
At the bare minimum, these coal ash dumps must be properly engineered, managed, and monitored to make sure these toxins don't seep into our waterways."
Environment Victoria policy and advocacy manager Bronya Lipski said:
"The expansion of the Loy Yang ash dam makes no sense and is inconsistent with the Victorian government's target of achieving 95% renewable energy by 2035, and emissions reduction targets of net zero by 2045.
We have concerns that the coal ash dam might be required for an ill-conceived coal to hydrogen plant in the Latrobe Valley – a proposal that would only make Japan's unproven energy solution Victoria's most recent environmental problem.
The EPA's landfill guidelines aren't good enough for ash dams.现有灰大坝下有巨型地下水流 他们EPA没有要求AGL清理江南极速存款Making this ash dam bigger is adding to an already huge problem.
We should be focussed on the energy transition, not extending the life of the coal industry."
Friends of Latrobe Water spokesperson Tracey Anton said:
"AGL shouldn't be allowed to dump coal ash next to our communities and put the health of an entire generation at risk.
AGL Energy doesn't plan to implement best practice techniques for coal ash management and will not adequately line the coal ash dams to prevent the risk of contamination seeping into the Traralgon Creek, Flynns Creek and the Latrobe River."
Background
AGL Energy is seeking approval to build six new coal ash cells and a second leachate pond alongside Loy Yang A power station, expanding its capacity for coal ash by 9,730,000 cubic metres.
Coal ash from Loy Yang A and B power stations would be mixed with water and pumped into enormous dump sites, creating a lethal cocktail of mercury, lead, arsenic, selenium and chromium.
In its application, AGL Energy has identified seven recent pollution events where the company was in potential breach of its licence conditions, including incidents relating to dust, odour, noise, leachate runoff, and inappropriate management of fuels and waste.
Victoria's new environmental laws require companies to minimise risks to human health and environment, so environment groups are calling on EPA Victoria to reject this proposal.
Anyone who feels they may be affected by AGL Energy's plans to expand toxic coal ash dumps to submit their comments online or email permissioning.engagement@epa.vic.gov.au
Public comments close at 11:59 pm, Monday 17 March 2023.
The post Toxic coal ash dumps leave Latrobe Valley communities at risk first appeared on Environment Victoria.
The post Toxic coal ash dumps leave Latrobe Valley communities at risk appeared first on Environment Victoria.
In response to Victorian Planning Minister Sonya Kilkenny's disclosure in parliament today that an additional Environmental Effects Statement will need to be prepared, Environment Victoria and ACF Geelong welcomed the decision but maintained that the proposal should have been rejected outright.
Environment Victoria CEO Jono La Nauze said:
"While we're pleased the government has acknowledged that Viva Energy's current Environmental Effects Statement is completely inadequate, the planning minister should go further and reject this polluting project.
"Viva Energy has had years to get their proposal right and have failed to address considerable community concerns.江南体育官方入口不值得再拍一次 。
'VivaEnergy环境效果声明一团糟,他们在听证会结束时提交修改技术注释,没有时间供其他方或专家证人盘问证据 。's Andrews政府刚刚赢得选举,保证对气候变化采取更多行动 — — 但Viva的建议与减少排放完全不相容 。江南极速存款天然气进口终端破解天然气,破坏Victoria对实践的禁止。
新环境效果声明必须考虑到Victoria新的气候变化目标到2035年将排放量削减达80%。
Victoria政府应该支持家庭和企业下调天然气,为高效电热电机和热水系统提供更强大的奖励江南极速存款That would free up more gas for industrial users while they also make the switch to cleaner energy sources.
"We need clear timelines and targets in the Gas Substitution Roadmap to ensure Victoria can get on with the urgent job of upgrading Victorian homes away from gas to efficient electric appliances.
"The last thing we need is a new gas terminal that will lock us into relying on expensive imported gas for years to come.
Mr Darcy Dunn, a spokesperson for the Geelong Renewables Not Gas campaign, run by ACF Community Geelong, said:
"While we welcome the government's acknowledgement that Viva Energy's Environment Effects Statement was flawed, Viva have had their chance.提交一万页证据如果第一次无法正确实现,社区何必相信第二次正确实现?
多2000人和组织提交反对Viva项目,包括Geelong语法学校、北岸居民协会、GeelongPort和许多其他社区组织和个人。
额外进程只会增加社区响应的负担江南极速存款ivaEnergy-forstation-to-draw-to-drainal-project/2022州选前,Andrews政府宣布新目标到2035年减排75%至80%。
Some gas industry forecasts assume very high levels of gas consumption until 2040, which poses a major problem for future emissions.江南极速存款If the most bullish of these forecasts come to pass, gas burned in Victorian homes and small businesses would be responsible for up to 37% of Victorian emissions by 2035 – more than triple the current share.
Urgent government action is needed to address this looming problem, including strengthening the policies and incentives for electrification in Victoria's Gas Substitution Roadmap.
Scroll down to read the report, or download it here >>
The post Gas sector emissions and Victoria's new 2035 climate targets first appeared on Environment Victoria.
The post Gas sector emissions and Victoria's new 2035 climate targets appeared first on Environment Victoria.
The post Gas could be biggest source of climate pollution in Victoria by 2035 first appeared on Environment Victoria.
The post Gas could be biggest source of climate pollution in Victoria by 2035 appeared first on Environment Victoria.
Last year the Andrews government announced a world-leading climate target to cut emissions by 75 to 80% by 2035, including a promise to close all remaining coal power stations and reach 95% renewable energy.
Having an end date for coal power is a massive step forward for climate action, especially in Victoria where we have some of the most polluting coal power stations in the world – but what about fossil gas?
Right now burning gas is responsible for about 17% of Victoria's climate pollution. But our analysis shows that as we phase out coal power, gas could become responsible for a whopping 45% of the state's emissions by 2035.江南极速存款
